Obama Economic Stimulus Includes Slaughter Of Innocent Infants

The election of Barack Hussein Obama and his Marxist agenda has caused a increase in the sales of guns and ammo, his inauguration it appears will be that Abortion (infanicide) will replace cars and trucks as one of our main exported items.

From the NYT:

The executive order that Mr. Obama signed reverses one of the first measures enacted by Mr. Bush when he took over the White House eight years ago and capped an opening-week flurry of action intended to signal a sharp break from the past in domestic and foreign arenas.

“For the past eight years, they have undermined efforts to promote safe and effective voluntary family planning in developing countries,” Mr. Obama said of the restrictions. “For these reasons, it is right for us to rescind this policy and restore critical efforts to protect and empower women and promote global economic development.”

In a written statement, Mr. Obama said he would work with Congress to restore financial support for the United Nations Population Fund. But he bemoaned the “politicization” of abortion and promised to reach out to all sides to initiate a new dialogue about reducing unintended pregnancies.

Essentially, we will be diverting funds away from groups that don’t promote the retail killing of unborn babies and direct those funds toward qroups that aggressively promote abortion as a means of “Family Planning”, and all this while the Moonbat Messiah is offering Constitutional Protection to Islamic Terrorists who would sooner blow themselves up in a crowded shopping mall then turn their lives around and “Change” what they’re doing.

I guess I just don’t fucking get it.  Why are liberals so aggressive and adamant about the Killing and Slaughter of millions of innocent unborn children, while in the same breath they are offering olive branches and protection to a culture that wants nothing more then to kill all of us, Christians and especially Jews.

Michelle Malkin has this interesting bit on the Democratic Culture of Death:

This will end in tears. The Obama hysteria is not merely embarrassing to witness, it is itself contributory to the scale of the disaster that is coming. What we are experiencing, in the deepening days of a global depression, is the desperate suspension of disbelief by people of intelligence – la trahison des clercs – in a pathetic effort to hypnotise themselves into the delusion that it will be all right on the night. It will not be all right…

…To anyone who kept his head, the string of Christmas cracker mottoes booming through the public address system on Washington’s National Mall can only excite scepticism. It is crucial to recall the reality that lies behind the rhetoric. Denouncing “those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents” comes ill from a man whose flagship legislation, the Freedom of Choice Act, will impose abortion, including partial-birth abortion, on every state in the Union. It seems the era of Hope is to be inaugurated with a slaughter of the innocents.

Looks like the era of Hope-N-Change will be ushered in under a dark cloud of death, but yet the Islamonazis that wish to reign death down up on America are seeing the rainbow of Change and it is bringing them Hope.

7 responses to “Obama Economic Stimulus Includes Slaughter Of Innocent Infants

  1. Obama has set new records for what a President Elect can accomplish between getting elected and his first week in office.

    But it is not what the Main Stream Media wants you to think.


    PS I like your blog. Care to exchange blogroll links? If yes put a comment on my blog including the link to you.

    Love ya! Nancy

  2. Here’s interesting twist to the Islam-is-out-get-you theory:

    “Mohammed Essam Derbala, one of the leaders of the Egyptian al-Gama’a al-Islamiya, today called on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda to declare a unilateral four month ceasefire [hudna] with the United States to test Barack Obama’s pledges to establish a new relationship with the Islamic world and to close Guantanamo.”

    Second, this senseless fear of Islam gives way too much credit to Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda apparatus. If all it would take was to burn down two towers, risking just 19 lives, to kill 3000+, to consume 300 millions minds in chaos, Bin Laden reaped even a bigger fruit that he would ever dream. But the election resulted in Obama’s victory changed that tune. Had Obama lost, the No.2 of AQ would have laughed, “Hey America is a racist, so think their democracy-spreading plan is anything but.”

    Instead, Obama’s victory disarmed AQ No.2 that most potent argument, prompting the ceasefire call mentioned above.

    Third, during the Founding Fathers’ time, there was equally amount of fear on Islam. But according to documents now in the Library of Congress, they insisted for extending the olive branch. Excerpt:

    “The Founders of this nation explicitly included Islam in their vision of the future of the republic. Freedom of religion, as they conceived it, encompassed it. Adherents of the faith were, with some exceptions, regarded as men and women who would make law-abiding, productive citizens. Far from fearing Islam, the Founders would have incorporated it into the fabric of American life. ”

    Source: http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0205/tolerance.html

    As for the abortion issue: It is much with the Supreme Court isn’t it? Many chances they had since Roe v. Wade to overturn the ruling, they chose instead not to. So the problem isn’t with the executive branch. It’s Congress and the judiciary.

  3. No HOPE for babies.

    No HOPE for morals

    No HOPE for taxpayer money, since it belongs to other nations now

    No HOPE for Israel….watch him…..he will turn his back if it is politically advantageous to him.

  4. @ Marianne:

    Our military runs on tax dollar. It’s not a private institution where it gets to sell its best and latest weapons to foreign power. Someone has to support it. So as our intelligence apparatus, from NSA, CIA, DIA, Sigint, Humint, and so forth. Not paying tax is like not paying for a fence. You are just asking for burglars storming the house unimpeded.

    Your fear of tax money “belongs to other nations now” is misplaced. Of the total tax spending, foreign aid primarily goes to 1. Israel and 2. Egypt. But even then, the spending figures nowhere near 1% of the total budget.

    Just today, I received a letter from Rev Peter J Klink SJ of the Red Cloud Indian School in South Dakota asking for money to support neglected children. If here is any lack of raw hope, it is dealing with the many children who “aren’t bad kids, but they missed a lot of school because their parents didn’t care.” Send any help you can to address of 100 Mission Dr, Pine Ridge SD 57770-2100. It is immoral to have children, then treat them like Mowgli by abandoning them to wolves.

    As for Israel. Let’s watch “Waltz for Bashir,” made by a Jewish soldier of the 1982 Lebanese war.

  5. I am so underwhelmed by the open transparancy that lauded the signing of the Mexico City Policy exec order. Where were the photographers, where were the group of loyal cabinet members aplauding. Where were the first daughters? Obama said that he wanted to teach them values and morals, this should have been a wonderful teachable moment from a dad to his daughters, that he would support the termination of a punishing mistake.

    Perhaps he could send the pen used to authorize the killing of the innocents to a childless couple, hoping, praying and willing to adopt a baby. It would be a nice touch and could make a great photo op. The MSM could take a photo of the tears on their face and report “Receipt of White House Pen Moves Couple to Tears”

    I’m ok with the new transparancy of the Obama admin. I can see right through him and always have.

    This year I am going to work toward getting as many people as I can to go to the March on Life 2010. 300k wasn’t enough to draw attention from our pres maybe 500k or a million would do it?

  6. To vaughn

    To foreign aid (1. Israel, 2 Egypt) , you can now add

    3. to the entire continent of Africa…..that should not cost too much, right?.

  7. Marianne,

    Again, the entire budget from president to president isn’t that whole lot. 1 percent. What strange is that it had not change since Carter and Oslo. You can add more countries into the pot, just mean that the pie has to divide more.

    1 percent, putting things in perspective, is about the size of the total pork-barrel spending of Congress to move along legislation.

    Not counted on the foreign aid budget is former president Bush’s “supplimental requests” for Iraq and subsequently, Afghanistan.

    Continent of Africa? I hope you do not mean Senegal, Benning, Sierra-Leone, Cote-d’Avoire, they don’t get USAID. They get charities, NGOs, one that my cousin served as part of her Peace Corps.

    Congo, both Republic and Democratic, got nothing from USAID. South Africa? Little to nil. Zimbabwe? Wished we could give them at least a dollar. Their inflation of million times could use a little currency boost.

    Foreign Policy compiles data of aid every year. Haven’t got the latest figures but when I do, we’ll revisit this subject. But previous years, U.S. gave abysmal number versus countries like Denmark and The Netherland.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s